Car Accidents And How A San Bernardino Car Accident Lawyer Can Help

The state of California has some of the busiest and indeed most congested roads in the country and as a result, car accidents are bound to happen. When they do, it is good to know that you don’t have to go through the whole experience on your own. Instead a San Bernardino Car Accident Lawyer is standing by to help. In fact, whether it be a minor fender bender or a horrific car accident a highly skilled and experienced attorney can be of assistance.

So with this in mind, what are some of the ways in which a San Bernardino car accident attorney can help?

Car accident disputes

In many instances accidents may involve one or more parties and as a result there could well be a liability dispute that has to be addressed before damages can be awarded and claims can be sorted. When this happens it is always best to contact a team or attorneys who are well versed in dealing with such issues. Some of the first people on the scene of an accident are the police and the insurance companies and quite often they can make assumptions about the accident that aren’t necessarily correct. The police simply don’t have the time or indeed the expenses in manpower to be able to mount a full investigation, and the insurers are only interested in paying out as little as possible. Quite often this leads to a potential client being blamed for an accident that probably wasn’t their fault.

On the contrary an experienced San Bernardino car accident lawyer will have the financial backing necessary to mount a full investigation into the cause of the accident. They do this by calling on a number of expert people who are able to use their experience to bring about the right conclusion. People such as accident investigators, mechanical experts, road design analysts and even forensic scientists can all be used to get to the bottom of the case. From the evidence presented an attorney will be able to pinpoint the blame and file a claim for any damages accordingly.

If upon investigation the fault partially lies with the plaintiff, then this does not mean that the person in question is not entitled to any damages. On the contrary a representing lawyer can look to claim what is known as ‘comparative’ fault. What this means is that the plaintiff would be awarded damages that are ‘comparative’ to their part in the accident. Let’s say for example that the jury found the plaintiff to be thirty percent responsible for the incident, then they would award the plaintiff seventy percent of the total amount of damages possible for such an accident. It is down to the representing attorney to negotiate the best deal for their client.